The main aim of the Discussion part of the research paper is to describe and elucidate the findings of the work you have done. The discussion of the research paper compare your work with previous literature. And explains new findings and ways to solve the existing issues.
The discussion part of the research will always connect to the introduction in terms of hypothesis and the research issues. It will also explain the literature reviewed to compare it with the recent research topic. It thoroughly explains the results obtained and practical application that are carried out.
Importance of a good Discussion Research Paper :
Table of Contents
this part is usually considered as the utmost desired section of the research study. Because it is the most effective proof that as a researcher, you have the potential to critically think about any problem. Where you also add solutions to the existing problems or problems solved.
The discussion part is where you can explore the main purpose of your research. Its inferences in other dimensions of the study. This is the section where you discuss about the possible amendments that can be carried out in future research.
In this section, you need to explain the significance of your research and how how that can help or fills the gaps in the field. if suitable, this part of the research is where one can present their findings and the solutions to reveal the new gaps that has not been discussed in previous literature.
Once your paper is completed, and its purpose outlined clearly and fully. Your discussion section informs readers about wider implications resulting from your findings; making these points crystal-clear without understating them can be challenging if writing for publications that select articles based on quality or impact potential alone; whatever journal your article will appear in though, “discussion” section serves this function regardless.
An effective discussion article must present your observations within context and contain:
Your research findings, along with the related work discussed and the original hypothesis compared, need to be presented here for discussion and comparison purposes.
Some important rules while writing the discussion part of your paper :
given below are some general rules while you sit to write your research discussion section.
- Never repeat one idea again and again
- Try to be very brief and clear about what you write
- Stay away from jargons
- For known facts use present tense. and for results obtained and references use past tense
- If required use subheadings to differentiate between the sections and parts of your research
Writing Tips For Research Paper :
Although these sections provide useful advice for brainstorming ideas and organizing discussions, writers often fall back into certain errors when writing an essay. Writing an effective discussion requires skillfully balancing results gathered with context provided for your study without adding extraneous details – make sure the paper you produce reflects genuine findings!
Review the guidelines for conclusion and discussion sections before starting writing your discussion, to make sure it adheres to their requirements.
- Step one is to craft an easily understood summary of major results, which will reinforce their primary message while setting up further discussion on them.
- Discuss why the results from your research are significant to readers, drawing out key takeaways from prior studies while remaining realistic with your conclusions and emphasizing both its strengths and its weaknesses.
- Show how your results support or refute your hypothesis and identify any causes if necessary.
- Add new ways or approaches for considering research questions. Outline the next steps that could be taken to pursue all unresolved inquiries.
- If you are dealing with an ongoing or recent problem such as climate change, consider its possible outcomes should they remain unsolvable.
- Keep things concise; adding unnecessary details could obfuscate what are truly key arguments and conclusions.
Don’t For Research Paper:
- Change your abstract statement. A statement beginning with “we investigated” or “we looked into” usually doesn’t lend itself well to debate.
- Make use of any new arguments or proof not previously considered in your article’s main part, along with relevant evidence.
- Apologize. Even when working under strict constraints, do not add further difficulties by making claims that undermine or challenge your method and implementation.
- Be careful to include both negatives and limitations when discussing research results, but incorporate any that exist for better reader understanding of your study. Potential limitations might include potential bias, risks to external or internal validity as well as obstacles or hurdles related to implementation and any additional issues inherent to its design.
- Be careful to not exaggerate the significance of your research findings. Large claims about what your study can accomplish might cause people to question its efficacy and cast doubt upon its results.